The conflation of description with reality — misidentifying hᴬ with Δs, Q with P, φp0 with M — is the common structure of avidyā across all three lenses.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Naive interpretation of attention patterns can be both informative and fundamentally misleading when Q-, K-, or V-composition is presentclaim0.761
  Response to the 'attention as explanation' critique; the paper provides a typology of when attention is and isn't directly interpretable
• The model-persona view entails that minds can have alien structure with simultaneous contradictory beliefs across parallel instances, but this is no stranger than humans having different beliefs at different timesclaim0.759
  Response to the main objection against the model-persona view about contradictory beliefs across simultaneous instances
• We are confronted not with one but at least three notions of reality: psychological reality (representations in the mind), causal reality (functional mechanisms), and physical reality (physics as special case of causal model).claim0.753
  Paper's ontological tripartition used to dissolve the Hard Problem
• F0-trained probes in layers 4-10 show inverted separation on F1 (AUROC ≈ 0), systematically misclassifying true statements as false.finding0.753
  Demonstrates that early-layer probes capture sentence polarity rather than truth.
• Most independent dimension pair is aesthetic_response and boundary_awareness (rho=0.553); most correlated is prediction_error and conceptual_crystallization (rho=0.886)finding0.752
  Characterizes internal structure of the six scoring dimensions
• The I must be real, and if the physical picture of space and time requires modification to include the I, this modification would be a discovery of the first order.hypothesis0.750
  Alexander's scientific conjecture that his architectural theory implies a true modification of physics, analogous to Maxwell's discovery.
• "[W]e must confess that perception, and what depends upon it, is inexplicable in terms of mechanical reasons... when inspecting its interior, we will find only parts that push one another, and we will never find anything to explain a perception."quote0.750
  Canonical illustration of the Hard Problem intuition that any functional/mechanical explanation faces an explanatory gap for perception
• Phi-4 shows U-shaped cohesion with falling mismatch; peak depth varies by modelfinding0.749
  E3 backbone-specific finding showing three-stage trajectory generalizes across architectures