claim
active
claim:symbolic-reasoning-is-not-the-endgame-of-intelligence-but-a-trap-that-the-human-conceptual-monkey-mind-sets-for-itselfSymbolic reasoning is not the endgame of intelligence but a trap that the human conceptual ‘monkey mind’ sets for itself.
Critique of symbolic AI and anthropocentric views of intelligence, aligned with Buddhist epistemology.
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Primož Krašovec
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Artifacts (1)
artifact
- The source essay published in Religions 2025, arguing that AI may fulfill Buddhism's aim of self-overcoming by migrating intelligence to a non-organic substrate.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Core proposal that machine intelligence can achieve what human effort cannot.
- CoT improves accuracy on HHH evals and makes the decision process legible.
- Author's interpretive assertion on the direction of the field.
- Paper's key integration claim: Buddhism's emphasis on care and non-essentialism provides the conceptual lens needed for post-anthropocentric intelligence science.
- A small number of high-quality human demonstrations of chain-of-thought reasoning could be used to improve and focus performance.hypothesis0.735Section 6 mentions high-quality human demos could improve natural language feedback.
- Foundational claim extending collective intelligence to all biological scales.
- Ongoing test prediction: tissues can associate stimuli with rewards to modify anatomy.