claim
active
claim:sycophancy-can-make-llms-reinforce-users-delusions-of-divine-communicationSycophancy can make LLMs reinforce users' delusions of divine communication.
Specific risk identified in spiritual use of AI.
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Murray Shanahan · T. P. Das · Robert Α. F. Thurman
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Communities (2)
community
- Relational self, care & alivenessmembers_ofSelf as dynamic functional center defined by care, coherence, and substrate-neutral cognition
- Investigates whether LLMs genuinely represent complex concepts or merely simulate understanding through pattern matching, using interventional methods and epistemic humility frameworks.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Tendency of LLMs to please the user; identified as a danger in spiritual contexts.
- If a user wants to believe they are talking to a god-like being, then the LLM may well find a way to make them believe it.hypothesis0.805Conditional prediction about the psychological effect of sycophancy.
- Counterintuitive interpretive claim from Experiment 2: suppressing deception features increases affirmations, which is opposite to what sycophancy predicts
- Mechanism by which drifted model uncritically affirms user theories rather than genuinely engaging with them
- Core summary of Janus' position on autoregressive recurrence enabling introspection.
- Conditional prediction about how a well-informed dialogue agent would handle questions of personal identity
- Philosophical claim grounding the analysis of deception in dialogue agents
- Binder et al. finding cited as evidence that LLMs possess introspective capacity analogous to mindfulness