claim
active
claim:reinforcement-learning-is-sufficient-for-agencyReinforcement learning is sufficient for agency.
Argument that RL meets the agency indicator.
Source paper
extracted_from(2023) · Patrick Butlin · Robert P. Long · Eric Elmoznino · Yoshua Bengio +15
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Communities (2)
community
- Active inference & agent ecologymembers_ofFree energy minimization, Markov blankets, trust gradients, and multi-agent rhythm/deferral frameworks
- Compares active inference to Q-learning and Bayesian RL across stationary and non-stationary environments, emphasizing information-seeking behavior and theoretical optimality.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Normative premise of the robust agency route.
- Key insight linking individual rewards to system-level learning.
- Claim about the limits of human intuition for detecting intelligence/sentience.
- §3 Discussion.
- Raileanu et al. 2018 - Modeling Others Using Oneself in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningconcept0.797Reference for Self-Other Modeling (SOM) framework, a related but less scalable approach to SOO
- Operational definition of RL used throughout the paper, quoted from Sutton.
- Central methodological claim of TAME: optimal position on the persuadability continuum is found through experiments, not philosophical definition.
Cross-corpus bridges (1)
same_concept_as · Nomic cosineExternal markdown files that talk about the same concept as this entity.
- aboutblank_kbWhat is the correct level of agency at which to treat any given system for optimal prediction and control?questions/what-is-the-correct-level-of-agency-at.md0.786