claim
active
claim:programming-systems-deserve-a-theory-tooProgramming systems deserve a theory too
Source paper
extracted_from(2023) · Jakubovic, Joel · Edwards, Jonathan · Petricek, Tomas
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Communities (2)
community
- Cross-scale frameworks linking spatial patterns, diagrams, and simplicity as expressions of care in design.
- Tuple space coordination languages (Linda, Parlog) enabling scalable parallel systems with composable specifications, circa 1980s–90s multicomputer platforms.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The speech act theory for programming can be simpler than human models.
- Key claim of the Algol 48/50 and Elephant approach.
- A descriptive finding that some theorists are already extending their frameworks beyond brains.
- Core assertion that systems perspective is incommensurable with language perspective; interaction, not code, is what matters in systems analysis.
- Problem statement motivating the technical dimensions framework; notes that publications tend to present singleton systems rather than addressing issues across multiple languages.
- Critique that Parlog's abstraction level is too high and restrictive.
- Mathematical and conceptual framework for modeling complex self-organizing systems; applied here to action and cognition.
- Steenson's direct refutation of Alexander's late-life position on empirically verifiable order; articulated in context of 2020 authoritarianism and Black Lives Matter.