Processes compatible with current professional norms spread more easily than deeply living transformative ones.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The larger task of making these processes genuinely morphogenetic so that they generate deeper and more coherent living structure—still lies on the horizon.claim0.796
• Moving beyond a vision of the Self as a persistent thing, toward a process philosophy, allows us to see change and growth with anticipation rather than fear.claim0.793
  Advocates for process philosophy as the appropriate framework for navigating AI, chimeras, and identity change
• Modern processes, for the most part, are not morphogenetic.claim0.790
  Asserts that 20th-century processes do not intentionally create living form, unlike the living processes described in chapters 6-17.
• Living processes are based necessarily on deep feeling.claim0.787
• A living process is always natural, similar to the best kind of natural process, but it goes deeper and includes additional centers that naive natural process may miss.claim0.785
  Positions living process as an refined version of innate human creativity, not an artificial imposition.
• Almost any social process can have a relatively more living character, or have a relatively less living character.claim0.785
• We hypothesize that a similar 'brutal' and purely geometric process always occurs somewhere in other kinds of unfolding that generate living order — in poetry, dance, social structure, planning, and family relationships.hypothesis0.783
  Extends the brutal geometry thesis beyond architecture into all creative and social domains; acknowledged as not yet confirmed with certainty
• Fundamental change, even in high-profile rigid processes like banking, is possible and has been demonstrated in our time.claim0.781
  Conclusion drawn from Grameen Bank success that small sequences can change entrenched systems.