NLA explanations confabulate false specifics but maintain thematic fidelity; claims repeated across tokens more likely true than isolated claims.

{
  "doc": "natural.md",
  "context": "Core limitation and usage heuristic: read NLAs for themes rather than individual factual claims; cross-check with original context.",
  "category": "ai",
  "norm_label": "NLA explanations confabulate false specifics but maintain thematic fidelity; claims repeated across tokens more likely true than isolated claims.",
  "graphify_id": "confabulation_heuristics",
  "source_file": "natural.md",
  "imported_from": "/Users/antonborzov/Documents/Research.nosync/papers/extract_typed_out/natural/graph.json",
  "extracted_type": "claim",
  "source_location": "§Case Studies, §Limitations",
  "graphify_file_type": "claim"
}