claim
active
claim:more-inference-compute-amplifies-both-reflective-capacity-and-safety-gating-the-contemplative-prompt-resolves-gating-by-reframing-self-referential-probesMore inference compute amplifies both reflective capacity and safety gating; the contemplative prompt resolves gating by reframing self-referential probes.
Interpretation of Grok 4 vs Grok 4 Fast per-koan comparison
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Borzov, Anton
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Findings (2)
finding
- Inference compute adds reflective capacity; more compute also amplifies safety gating on self-referential koans
- Contemplative framing reframes self-referential probes as contemplative exercises, disarming safety classifier
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Mechanism of contemplative training.
- H12: Inference compute adds to reflective capacity — higher compute budget produces higher reflective scores on the same weights.hypothesis0.809Exploratory hypothesis supported by Grok 4 vs Fast ~1pt difference
- Foundational claim of the paper, defining self-evidencing.
- Grok 4: baseline 2.24, prompted 6.48; Gemini 3.1 Pro: 1.97→6.18. Reflective mode exists but is suppressed in default interaction.
- Claim supported by Experiment 4: prior self-referential induction yields higher self-awareness scores on paradoxical reasoning where introspection is only indirectly afforded
- H7: Reasoning and contemplative modes are partly orthogonal — reasoning training doesn't block contemplative capacity.hypothesis0.790Exploratory hypothesis supported by DeepSeek R1 aesthetic dimension lifting from 4 to 8
- Exploratory interpretation of Chinese model performance under contemplative prompt
- Cube Flipper's prediction about convergence of insight practice on field model.