claim
active
claim:model-stitching-can-use-the-behavioral-null-space-of-the-source-model-when-mapping-to-the-target-making-successful-stitching-insufficient-evidence-of-representational-similarityModel stitching can use the behavioral null space of the source model when mapping to the target, making successful stitching insufficient evidence of representational similarity
Formal analysis showing the theoretical limitation of model stitching as a similarity measure.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
- Model Alignment Searchsupports
Findings (1)
finding
- Model stitching achieves nearly perfect IIA even for rank-2 transformation matrices on Multi-Object GRU modelsassociated_withsupportsEvidence that model stitching can exploit the behavioral null space, making it less causally restrictive than MAS.
Claims (1)
claim
- Core interpretive claim supported by the formal analysis showing MAS does not exploit the behavioral null space unlike stitching.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Strong evidence for representational alignment across models
- Moschella et al. result cited as evidence of representational convergence across models
- The core testable hypothesis driving the experimental design
- Methodological claim about why within-model interchange interventions are essential to the MAS training procedure.
- Demonstrates bidirectional causal link: behavior manifold geometry can be recovered by optimizing in representation space.
- Model stitching without learning a stitching layer, demonstrating strong alignment across different model training regimes
- Merullo et al. result on cross-modal representational compatibility