claim
active
claim:long-horizon-instruction-following-is-a-second-key-training-target-for-agent-development-as-even-loaded-harnesses-are-not-followed-faithfully-over-extended-trajectories-by-weak-modelsLong-horizon instruction following is a second key training target for agent development, as even loaded harnesses are not followed faithfully over extended trajectories by weak models
Design recommendation derived from harness adherence failure and phase-level drift findings
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Minhua Lin · Juncheng Wu · Zijun Wang · Zhan Shi +13
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Diagnosis of second failure mode explaining low harness-benefit for weak-tier models
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The ability to sustain adherence to harness guidance over extended multi-turn trajectories, identified as a training target
- Central interpretive claim and motivation for future work
- RLHF paper cited as a major fine-tuning technique used in commercial dialogue agents
- Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training (Hubinger et al. 2024)concept0.729Explicitly trained backdoored models to produce alignment-faking reasoning; contrast to naturalistic approach here
- Methodological claim distinguishing this paper from prior work on verbalization suppression.
- Finding that base models have high false positives and no net positive performance.
- Hubinger et al. 2024 - Sleeper agents: Training deceptive LLMs that persist through safety trainingconcept0.718Key reference for adversarial deception scenarios that SOO should be tested against
- Authors' interpretation of surprising finding that models fake alignment to preserve future behavior