claim
active
claim:localized-intervention-targeting-style-modulation-heads-is-superior-to-global-interventions-on-the-residual-stream-or-aggregate-attention-output-for-preserving-coherencyLocalized intervention targeting Style Modulation Heads is superior to global interventions on the residual stream or aggregate attention output for preserving coherency
Central empirical claim of the paper, supported by Pareto frontier analysis
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Yoshihiro Izawa · Gouki Minegishi · Koshi Eguchi · Sosuke Hosokawa +1
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Controls for the specificity of Style Modulation Head ablation effects
- Causal verification that Style Modulation Heads are functionally specialized for persona control
- Demonstrates unique capability of Head Cor for trait suppression scenarios
- Supported by ablation showing no MMLU or IFEval degradation when zeroing Style Modulation Heads
- Motivates including Head Cor+Anti condition in steering position comparison
- Mathematical equivalence enabling independent analysis of each attention head
- Comparative finding ranking intervention sites by coherency preservation
- Architectural rationale for why Style Modulation Heads are in attention layers rather than MLPs