claim
active
claim:living-structure-may-be-identified-empirically-by-the-extent-to-which-it-is-a-picture-of-one-s-selfLiving structure may be identified empirically by the extent to which it is a picture of one's self.
Alexander claims there is an empirical method for identifying living structure via reference to the universal entity within each person.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (1)
concept
- Best Self / Deep Selfassociated_withThe reservoir of goodness within each person that serves as the internal reference for harmony, rightness, and the recognition of living structure.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- From the concluding Part Two interlude, asserting a synthesis of science and feeling.
- Living structure might even be defined as 'that which pleases us'—that which truly pleases us.claim0.838A proposed operational definition of living structure in terms of genuine pleasure.
- Warning that the recursion of centers requires extreme precision.
- Conclusion drawn from the two propositions that makes the beings model explicit.
- Alexander's strongest ontological claim: living structure is not probabilistically improbable but mathematically necessary given the principle of unfolding wholeness
- The closing claim of the chapter's mid-book appendix, asserting that the theory of centers has implications for physics.
- The epistemological grounding of the mirror-of-the-self test.
- The most profound claim of the chapter: the niceness of the sequence is directly perceptible in the built form and is the ultimate source of living quality.