Late binding increases the significance of temporal forces on the system's functionality and its corresponding ability to change its functionality at runtime.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• "The runtime architecture of a system" crystallizes the notion that temporal relationships matter more than static code structure.concept0.753
• An explicit focus on runtime architecture leads to a more dynamic and changeable system.claim0.749
  Core design philosophy of the paper.
• Parameters did not change; the binding did.quote0.747
  Emphasizes that anchoring is a binding process without weight updates.
• Object models in which time, versioning, causality, etc., are significant are probably far better modelled by considering the time component as another key rather than an intrinsic property of the underlying model.claim0.744
  Claim that orthogonal dimensions like time should be explicit keys in the associative model.
• Mechanism by which activation of an emotion feature sometimes leads to later suppression of that same featurequestion0.744
  Identified research gap: the paper observes anti-persistence but has no explanation for it
• Pretraining stores latent patterns that coherent anchors can bind (or misbind) to targets.quote0.743
  Load-bearing quote capturing the core metaphor
• Representational dynamics aligned with reward improvement in most RL tasks.finding0.742
  Secondary empirical result: CE-based representational changes correlate with task success.
• Temporal logic is too weak to express many important properties of programs.claim0.742
  Criticism of temporal logic as a verification tool.