claim
active
claim:it-has-long-been-said-that-programming-languages-need-more-of-the-features-of-natural-language-but-it-has-not-been-clear-what-the-desirable-features-areIt has long been said that programming languages need more of the features of natural language, but it has not been clear what the desirable features are.
Introduction, motivating the proposal.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- A programming language is low level when its programs require attention to the irrelevant.concept0.819Epigraph by Alan Perlis motivating the search for abstract conceptual models in Fruit's design philosophy.
- Claim about the limited utility of natural language surface features.
- Core assertion that systems perspective is incommensurable with language perspective; interaction, not code, is what matters in systems analysis.
- Opening sentence setting the stage for the importance of interpretability.
- Argument that recursion equations are inappropriate for many important parallel programs.
- Critique of the functional-level argument based on mental models.
- From Turner (1982), cited to represent the functional programming community's view and then refuted.
- Articulates why a one-layer transformer with MLP is the appropriate starting target for mechanistic interpretability