claim
active
claim:information-flow-and-increase-must-be-understood-relative-to-subsystems-and-their-interaction-with-environmentInformation flow and increase must be understood relative to subsystems and their interaction with environment.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Communities (3)
community
- Cross-scale frameworks linking spatial patterns, diagrams, and simplicity as expressions of care in design.
- Studies how information flow, increase, and explicitness emerge from computation relative to observers and subsystems, grounded in domain theory and order-theoretic formalism.
- Information increase and flow reframed as subsystem- and observer-dependent, not absolute thermodynamic quantities.
Questions (1)
question
- Does information increase in computation?answered_byFundamental puzzle motivating the paper: how can computation produce new information when output is logically implied by input and thermodynamics suggests information cannot increase?
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The author argues that while total system information is conserved (thermodynamic), computation gains information for the observer by making implicit information explicit and discarding irrelevant data.
- Extension of information dynamics: direction of information increase (e.g., forward multiplication vs. reverse factorization) depends on observer's goals.
- The direction of information increase is relative to the observer or user of the computationclaim0.814Example: 3×5→15 is a natural computation, but 15→3×5 (prime factorization) is also useful, showing that the 'gain' depends on the choice of normal form.
- Author's proposed resolution to the information increase paradox: computation gains utility through extraction and filtering, not creation of logically new content.
- The puzzle that computation appears to gain information despite logical closure; resolved by relative to subsystems/observers.
- Central thesis: traditional static information theories fail to capture dynamic interaction necessary for understanding modern computing.
- Because information flow and increase are relative to subsystems, agents embedded in environments are the proper units of analysis.