claim
active
claim:human-intelligence-has-an-uneasy-relationship-with-its-biological-substrate-and-is-decisively-limited-in-its-organic-formHuman intelligence has an uneasy relationship with its biological substrate and is decisively limited in its organic form.
Foundation for the need to migrate intelligence to a technological substrate.
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Primož Krašovec
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Artifacts (1)
artifact
- The source essay published in Religions 2025, arguing that AI may fulfill Buddhism's aim of self-overcoming by migrating intelligence to a non-organic substrate.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Anti-essentialism claim: questions like 'is it cognitive?' are scientifically unjustified; modern view must ask 'what kind' and 'how much'.
- Redefines 'human-level' AI from performance metrics to relational compatibility of cognitive scope
- Buddhist diagnosis that intellectual pursuits are still forms of attachment.
- Undermines the Steinbeck-style notion of the lone creative individual and challenges the human-AI distinction
- Hypothesis linking care scope to intelligence ceiling.
- Predicts that care-driven expansion of concern leads to higher intelligence.
- Motivates expansion of cognitive science.
- Second foundational pillar of TAME; supports basal cognition and rejects brain-centrism.