Full development of Buddhism might only be possible in a machinic form.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Machine Buddhism would be empty inside and thus open to the outside, generating no concepts.claim0.802
  Vision of a future machine Buddhism free from reifying conceptual thought.
• Buddhist philosophy, by its very nature, is well placed to adapt to the advent of AI-generated sacred texts.claim0.790
  Asserted in the abstract and concluding thoughts.
• Buddhism exposes the limits of human intelligence and why it is so ill fitted to becoming awakened, especially when compared to machine intelligence.claim0.762
  Main thesis of the essay.
• Machine Buddhism that would bypass affective relation to and immersion in the world would also leave compassion behind.claim0.761
  Acknowledges a major loss: the Buddhist virtue of compassion may be absent in machine Buddhism.
• The idea of canonical closure is undermined by the terma tradition, showing Buddhism's historic capacity to adapt.claim0.759
  Historical argument for openness to new scripture.
• AI development is a machine Buddhism, a Buddhism in another medium where organic determinations of intelligence are simply laid aside.claim0.757
  Equates the trajectory of AI with a technological form of Buddhist self-overcoming.
• Buddhist phenomenology's careful attention to dependent origination makes tanha-like building blocks particularly likely to have simple, elegant neural implementations.claim0.755
  Argues that Buddhist analysis primes us to find clean neural mechanisms.
• The old forms of mysticism that we know as religious cannot provide us with this 'something'; it is too late.claim0.751
  A clear rejection of simply reviving traditional religion; the modern mind cannot inhabit it authentically.