Frege compositionality requires bottom-up meaning flow from parts to whole, contrasting with context principle's top-down flow.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Frege's Context Principleconcept0.809
  Complementary principle to Frege compositionality: word meaning only meaningful in sentence context (top-down meaning flow).
• Contextual constraints (top-down and bottom-up) replace efficient causation in explaining action.claim0.796
  Foundational reframing that allows Juarrero to dissolve traditional puzzles like wayward causal chains.
• Meaning of a whole (cf. sentence) should only depend on meanings of its parts (cf. words) and how they are fitted together (cf. grammar).concept0.767
  Canonical statement of Frege compositionality principle in formal linguistics; foundational to paper's analysis.
• Composition is non-trivial, i.e. a whole cannot be decomposed meaningfully.claim0.745
  Defining property of Schrödinger compositional theory
• Foundation-ness is precisely the degree to which learned representations remain coherent when the ground shifts; loss of coherence forces fallback to prior defaults.claim0.744
• Embedment has a hierarchical structure, making use of the position of the left-hand margin as a way to organize relations among elements of an argument.claim0.737
  Defines embedment as a spatially hierarchical technique.
• Stem base is sound, complete, and of minimal cardinality for implicational theory of a formal context.finding0.736
• Bottom-up learning creates a non-decomposable whole (attractors that are non-linearly separable functions of the inputs and depend on the system’s own internal history), which means that credit assignment or reward at the level of individual parts becomes ineffective.claim0.736
  Explains how collective cognition becomes irreducible to parts.