Deep interlock and ambiguity appear in systems that maximize surface area or allow dual belonging, e.g., cerebellum, magnetic domains, molecular bonds.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Deep Interlock and Ambiguityconcept0.861
  The property that centers are hooked into their surroundings through intermediate centers that belong ambiguously to both, making it difficult to disentangle the center from its context and creating deeper unification
• The deep symmetry between problem-solving in anatomical, physiological, transcriptional, and 3D spaces drives specific hypotheses.claim0.789
  Evolution pivoted the same problem-solving strategies across different domains.
• The interlock of space and mass is the crux of architecture.claim0.780
  State that the heart of architecture lies in forming an interlocking fabric of positive space and solid.
• The deep nature of space appears to be so profound that just the geometric unfolding, when done properly, leads to results which make sense from an engineering point of view.claim0.773
  The mystery that beautiful geometry often yields good structural behavior is acknowledged but not yet fully explained mathematically.
• Cluster 3 (4-cluster): BOUNDARIES, STRONG CENTERS, DEEP INTERLOCK AND AMBIGUITYfinding0.769
  Third cluster of the four-cluster grouping, containing properties 3, 2, 8.
• "We could continue to invent new and exciting mechanisms beyond context-orientation and Worlds, ad absurdum, or recognise they are all just points within a dimensionally unbounded space of related, self-similar mechanisms."concept0.755
  Claim that many advanced programming paradigms reduce to parameterizations of the n-way associative model.
• You can only get the profound multiple structure of centers by unfolding each bit from the previous state, allowing the next layer of structure to appear from the previously established layers.claim0.754
  Explains why time and sequence are essential for generated complexity.
• In buildings, especially, the success of the process will be judged by the extent to which these middle-range entities appear with their own distinct symmetries, with their own definite and distinct force as strong centers.claim0.754
  Proposes middle-range entity quality as the criterion for judging the success of a building process