Conventional programming is precise only about how, not what.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Conventional programming is precise only about how, not what. It is not only not right, it is not even wrong.concept0.923
• Precise specification informs use and implementation without entangling them.claim0.782
• A computer program is not defined by its language or hardware but as an abstract causal pattern, a dynamic mathematical structure that influences the physical universe without violating its causal closure.claim0.767
  Paper's ontological characterization of software enabling cyberanimism
• In modern architecture, neither design nor construction typically works step by step; instead there is a fixed end-state produced without realistic feedback.claim0.764
  Contrast between living process and current architectural practice.
• Everything is vague to a degree you do not realize till you have tried to make it precise.concept0.762
  Epigraph motivating the necessity of precise semantic specification in programming
• Proving that a program meets accomplishment specifications must be based on assumptions about the world, the information it makes available to the program and the effects of the program's actions as well as on facts about the program itself.claim0.761
  Claim about the nature of accomplishment verification.
• No special theory of programming is required to prove properties of programs if they are expressed as logical sentences.claim0.757
  Key claim of the Algol 48/50 and Elephant approach.
• Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.quote0.756
  Einstein's assertion invoked to explain why BMR preserves accuracy while reducing complexity