claim
active
claim:constraints-and-biases-of-human-intelligence-are-best-avoided-by-designing-for-emergence-rather-than-implementing-a-pre-existing-theory-of-intelligenceConstraints and biases of human intelligence are best avoided by ‘designing for emergence’ rather than implementing a pre-existing theory of intelligence.
Recommendation for creating non-anthropocentric machine intelligence.
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Primož Krašovec
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Artifacts (1)
artifact
- The source essay published in Religions 2025, arguing that AI may fulfill Buddhism's aim of self-overcoming by migrating intelligence to a non-organic substrate.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Central thesis of the paper — the framing premise from which all other arguments follow
- Open-ended evolution of intelligence is possible because agents are collectives without fixed essencehypothesis0.804Follows from observation that intelligent systems lack context-transcendent core; their maxima are not contingent on permanent character.
- Consciousness in AI is best assessed by drawing on neuroscientific theories of consciousness.claim0.795Central methodological claim of the paper.
- Russell's statement opening Section 2 articulating the core motivation for the Contemplative AI approach
- Applied aim of the framework.
- Implication of PRH for 'scale is all you need' argument
- Argues that the impulse to sharply demarcate humans from AI stems from misguided zero-sum thinking
- AI systems which possess more of the indicator properties are more likely to be conscious.claim0.781Graded claim about the rubric.