claim
active
claim:a-belief-in-impermanence-can-be-computationally-modeled-as-a-global-belief-in-volatility-leading-to-increased-learning-rate-and-weakened-priorsA belief in impermanence can be computationally modeled as a global belief in volatility leading to increased learning rate and weakened priors
Novel computational translation of the Buddhist doctrine of impermanence into active inference parameters
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Ruben Laukkonen · Fionn Inglis · Shamil Chandaria · Lars Sandved-Smith +4
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (1)
concept
- Precision Parameter (γ)associated_withCore mechanism across all three levels; inverse variance controlling how much the system trusts evidence at each hierarchical level.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Self-reinforcing hypothesis about how emptiness recognition could be intrinsically maintained in AI systems
- Foundational claim of the paper, defining self-evidencing.
- Friston's key assertion resolving the tautology: existence implies free energy minimization, making inference inevitable.
- Central claim about the power of connectionism.
- Core definitional quote for performative chain-of-thought
- Opening sentence defining self-evidencing.
- Asserts that the theoretical foundation laid out in the four books provides a public quality standard for sequences.