claim
active
claim:4b819bd4bea17b6dRepresentation and computation can diverge; cyclic geometry is representational invariant while operations use generic substrate.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Communities (3)
community
- Explores geometry of activation/behavior manifolds to enable selective, non-destructive concept interventions.
- Concepts encoded as curved manifolds and circular structures in LLM activation spaces.
- Geometric structure in neural representations causally determines computation and behavior across diverse architectures, revealed through analysis of learned manifolds and cyclic concepts.
Vectors (1)
vector
- Convergent Representationsaddresses_vector
Source docs (1)
source_doc
- 2026-05-14_phil-trans-A-goodfire-aboutblank-impact.mdextracted_from
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Author’s interpretive claim that the shared geometry is general and robust.
- Broader interpretive claim about LM learning bias inferred from the findings
- The paper's generalization claim, asserting that the days-of-week finding scales to other cyclic and structured concepts.
- The paper's finding that the alignment holds in both directions — from representation to behavior and from behavior back to representation space.
- Interpretive assertion: the same geometric structure (e.g. circular for days) appears identically in both internal activations and output probabilities.