UX laws (Fitts, Proximity, Miller) are the engineering of care under cognitive constraint, not borrowed metaphors.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• About Blank's Geometry of Care will require reformulation against Levin-Lyons' 9 cognitive-glue properties, with credit assignment and hijackability emerging as load-bearing constraints.prediction0.781
• An equivalent of Ohm’s law for stress, care, and intelligence would provide a key for understanding the evolution of intelligence across a wide range of spaces.hypothesis0.762
  Speculative suggestion for a mathematical formalization.
• Care, intelligence, and stress stand in proportional relationships analogous to charge, current, and resistance in Ohm's law.hypothesis0.760
  Suggests mathematical formalization path for SCI loop dynamics; proposes metrics for efficient care-driven paths.
• The constitutional approach makes it easier to control AI behavior precisely and with far fewer human labels.claim0.755
  Explicit principles replace large datasets of preference labels, enabling faster iteration.
• The only human oversight is provided through a list of rules or principles, and so we refer to the method as 'Constitutional AI'.quote0.754
  Defines the core concept of the paper.
• Rules, laws, restrictions, are too exact, too restrictive to create living space; a shared vision is needed instead.claim0.754
  Argument that abstract codes cannot guarantee the emergence of shaped space with deep feeling.
• Products are externalized expressions of care rather than pure task-completion systems.claim0.753
• Care, intelligence, and stress stand in dynamic relation analogous to voltage, current, and resistance in Ohm's law.finding0.750