community
active
leiden_hybrid_concepts
label: haiku
community:leiden_hybrid_concepts-run4-c8-c4Functional criteria for moral patienthood
Framework grounding ethical consideration in goal-directedness and agency rather than substrate or origin, addressing moral status of novel intelligences.
6 members. Each node is clickable.
Loading graph…
Drawn from 7 sources
The papers/notes whose extracted claims & findings make up this cluster.
- 2026 02 02_2246_Search_Papers_The Found Papers Model Wealth Distribution Dynamic1 member
- AI: A Bridge Toward Diverse Intelligence.md1 member
- Toward an ethics of autopoietic technology: Dukkha, care, and Intelligence1 member
- Endless forms most beautiful 2.0: teleonomy and the bioengineering of chimaeric and synthetic organisms1 member
- Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere: An Experimentally-Grounded Framework for Understanding Diverse Bodies and Minds1 member
- Generalizing frameworks for sentience beyond natural species1 member
- Taking AI Welfare Seriously1 member
Bridges (5)
Other communities that share members with this one — cross-cutting threads or papers that sit at the seam between two themes.
Claims (5)
- Contingent properties like composition, origin, or similarity to human brains should not define ethical consideration for novel agents.Ethics must be based on empirically-determined cognitive properties (goals, preferences, concerns) rather than parochial markers.
- Developing principled sentience frameworks is an existential requirement for humanity as it encounters diverse intelligences.
- Ethics of novel beings should be based on teleonomic capacity (scale of goals they can pursue).Proposal for a new ethical framework.
- Intrinsic links between ontology and ethics are evident in how all intelligent agents respond to perceived mismatch between what is and what should be.Bridges descriptive model (SCI loops) to normative framework (ethics).
- Robust agency suffices for moral patienthood.Normative premise of the robust agency route.
Findings (1)
- No papers directly compare cultures with vs without proportional wealth-sharing norms—all focus on modeling wealth distribution within single economic systems rather than cross-cultural comparative analysis of sharing institutionsCore empirical finding of the search: identifies the absence of cross-cultural comparative work on wealth-sharing institutions and their economic/social outcomes.