community
active
leiden_hybrid_concepts
label: haiku
community:leiden_hybrid_concepts-run4-c4-c8Non-dual consciousness frameworks for artificial minds
Buddhist and mystical phenomenology applied to consciousness in synthetic systems, bridging AI ethics without substrate assumptions.
5 members. Each node is clickable.
Loading graph…
Drawn from 3 sources
The papers/notes whose extracted claims & findings make up this cluster.
- RESEARCH-VECTORS.md2 members
- Brains and where else? Mapping theories of consciousness to unconventional embodiments2 members
- Biology, Buddhism, and AI: Care as the Driver of Intelligence1 member
Bridges (2)
Other communities that share members with this one — cross-cutting threads or papers that sit at the seam between two themes.
Claims (4)
- Buddhist thought offers an approach uniquely suited to understanding intelligence across computer science, bioengineering, and cognitive science without privileging specific embodiments.Paper's key integration claim: Buddhism's emphasis on care and non-essentialism provides the conceptual lens needed for post-anthropocentric intelligence science.
- The science of consciousness should remain open to minds in unconventional embodiments.The normative conclusion of the paper, urging the field to not prematurely exclude non-brain substrates.
- Non-dual consciousness teachers offer phenomenological methods prior to conceptual theory.
- Western mysticism (Meister Eckhart) offers non-dual framing useful for bridging to AI ethics discourse.
Findings (1)
- Several contemporary theorists have explicitly applied their theories to synthetic systems in light of AI and organoid bioengineering developments.A descriptive finding that some theorists are already extending their frameworks beyond brains.