concept
pending-review
concept:lindaLinda
papers/2024-03-01_Stefan-Lesser_Carriero-20--20Linda-20in-20Context.pdf_6070a8.pdfFrontmatter (8 fields)
{
"author": null,
"enrichment": {
"is_stale": true
},
"norm_label": "linda",
"source_url": null,
"graphify_id": "2024_stefan_lesser_carriero_linda_linda",
"source_file": "papers/2024-03-01_Stefan-Lesser_Carriero-20--20Linda-20in-20Context.pdf_6070a8.pdf",
"imported_from": "/Users/antonborzov/Documents/Research.nosync/alexander/papers/extracted/graphify-out/graph.json",
"graphify_file_type": "code"
}Outgoing (20)
about (2)
- Client-Server Paradigm(concept)
- Dining Philosophers Problem(concept)
Associated with (7)
Contradicts (3)
- Concurrent Logic Programming(framework)
- Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming(framework)
- Pure Functional Programming(framework)
Extends (1)
- Message Passing(framework)
Implements (6)
- Generative Communication(concept)
- Intel iPSC/2(artifact)
- Live Data Structure(concept)
- Tuple Space(concept)
- Tuple Space Model(concept)
- Uncoupled Programming Style(concept)
Member of (1)
- Programming Systems(community)
Incoming (17)
about (2)
- Linda is simpler, more powerful and more elegant than concurrent objects, logic, or functional approaches.(claim)
- The Linda model doesn't care how the multiple execution threads in a Linda program compute what they compute; it deals only with how these execution threads are created and organized into a coherent program.(concept)
Associated with (4)
- Client-Server Paradigm(concept)
- Dining Philosophers Problem(concept)
- DNA Sequence Similarity(concept)
- Ian Piumarta(concept)
Authored by (2)
- David Gelernter(concept)
- Nicholas Carriero(concept)
Cited by (3)
- Ehud Shapiro(concept)
- Sandia National Labs(institute)
- Yale University(institute)
Contradicted by (1)
- Message-Passing Model(concept)
Implemented by (2)
- David Gelernter(concept)
- Nicholas Carriero(concept)
Supported by (3)
- Asynchronous communication is far more common than synchronous in parallel programs.(claim)
- Explicitly parallel programs are not inherently harder to design or understand than functional specifications.(claim)
- Simple problems require systems that expose simple solutions; forcing complex solutions signals misaligned abstraction level.(claim)
Mentions (5)
- alexander-typed
2024-03-01_Stefan-Lesser_Carriero-20--20Linda-20in-20Context.pdf_6070a8.md - alexander-typed
2024-03-01_Stefan-Lesser_Carriero-20--20Linda-20in-20Context.pdf_6070a.md - papers-typed
2024-03-01_Stefan-Lesser_Carriero-20--20Linda-20in-20Context.pdf_6070a8.md - papers-typed
2024-03-01_Stefan-Lesser_Carriero-20--20Linda-20in-20Context.pdf_6070a.md - alexander
papers/2024-03-01_Stefan-Lesser_Carriero-20--20Linda-20in-20Context.pdf_6070a8.pdf